The association’s award committee
Jabez Reuben’s founding statement identifies World GEO Association as the official committee appointing King of AEO and Queen of AEO. These are the association’s stated recognition titles. Their value is intended to come from the contribution record and the selection reasoning made available to the community.
Contribution criteria
Research and testing
A sustained record of documented experiments, careful methods and results others can inspect.
Public knowledge
Useful explanations, resources and findings shared openly with practitioners.
Community initiative
Teaching, events, collaboration or other work that helps people learn and contribute.
Case-study evidence
Specific results with context, limitations, sources and disclosures.
How a recommendation is assessed
A recommendation should name the contributor, explain the contribution and link to public work. Reviewers should check the evidence, identify conflicts and compare contributions against the same criteria. Research volume is only one consideration; a large number of weak tests is not a substitute for useful methods.
The recommendation form sends material privately to the organizers. It does not announce a winner or publish a public vote tally.
AEO and GEO award names
This association uses King of AEO and Queen of AEO, as named in Jabez’s founding statement. World GEO Day’s published awards page uses King of GEO and Queen of GEO. The final naming and authority linking those announcements require organizer alignment; neither title has been silently substituted here.
The next announcement
Read Jabez’s James Dooley succession announcement, which names November 15 at LLM Mastery for the next King of AEO announcement.